Comparison of postanesthetic complaints after general and spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery.

نویسندگان

  • Banjong Krobbuaban
  • Sujarit Kumkeaw
  • Natha Pakdeesirivong
  • Siriwan Diregpoke
چکیده

BACKGROUND The choice of anesthesia is one of the most important decisions made by anesthesiologists after preoperative visits with orthopedic patients. No published study has yet quantified the incidence of postanesthetic complaints for either technique. The present study was designed to compare the incidences of postanesthetic complaints after the application of the standardized techniques of spinal anesthesia, using a 27 - gauge needle, and two forms of general anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD In a prospective, randomized, observer blind trial, 260 orthopedic patients who underwent lower limb surgery were randomized into 3 groups; 1) spinal anesthesia (SA), 2) general anesthesia via facemask (GA-M), 3) general anesthesia via endotracheal intubation (GA-T). On postoperative days 1 and 3, patients were interviewed specifically about postanesthetic complaints. RESULTS The present study indicated that the incidence of backache was significantly higher in SA (p = 0.01), while nausea/vomiting (p = 0.00) and headache (p = 0.02) were more frequent in GA-M and GA-T on the first postoperative day. In the 3-day period of observation in the ward, the incidence of postoperative complaints did not significantly differ among the three groups. CONCLUSION Spinal anesthesia using a 27-gauge Quincke needle is associated with a lower incidence of postanesthetic complaints compared with general anesthesia. This technique may be recommended for patients undergoing lower limb surgery.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the upper and lower extremities during spinal anesthesia

Introduction: During spinal anesthesia, measurement of blood pressure is often obtained by an indirect method using an inflatable cuff on the upper arm. The relationship between the blood pressure measurements at the two sites in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the difference observed in systolic blood pressure (SBP) taken from the upp...

متن کامل

Comparison of the effect of adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to bupivacaine on nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery with spinal anesthesia: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Nausea and vomiting after surgery is a relatively common complication that despite advances in prevention and treatment is still the most problematic side effect observed in the recovery room and after surgery. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to bupivacaine on nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing orthopedic lower extremity surger...

متن کامل

Is Spinal Anesthesia with Low Dose Lidocaine Better than Sevoflorane Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

Background: To evaluate general anesthesia with sevoflurane vs spinal anesthesia with low dose lidocaine 5% onhemodynamics changes in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Methods: In this randomized double blind trial 100 patients (50 patients in each group) older than 60 years underhip surgery were randomized in general anesthesia with sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia with lidocaine 5%.He...

متن کامل

The Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia on Serum Lipid Peroxides and Total Antioxidant Capacity in Diabetic Patients with Lower Limb Amputation Surgery

Background: Anesthesia is performed in two major methods including regional and general.The aim of this study was to compare the effect of anesthesia method (spinal and general) on oxidative stress indiabetic patients underwent diabetic amputation surgery.Methods: In this randomized control trial, 40 patients with diabetic foot who were candidate for foot amputationsurgery at our academic hospi...

متن کامل

Comparison Hemodynamic Effects of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as a Premedication in Patients Undergoing Upper Limb Surgeries: A Double-blind Intervention

Introduction: Premedication is an integral part of general anesthesia which has side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as a premedication in patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery during induction of anesthesia and postoperative shivering. Methods: 60 candidates for elective upper limb surgery who referred to Shahid R...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet

دوره 88 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005